1. <tbody id="non6u"><div id="non6u"><address id="non6u"></address></div></tbody>
    2. <track id="non6u"><span id="non6u"></span></track>
    3. <menuitem id="non6u"><dfn id="non6u"></dfn></menuitem>
      代寫 TAG標簽
      網站地圖
      返回首頁

      留學生作業:淺談理性決策

      時間:2021-02-03 15:37來源:www.nguoikontum.com 作者:Hpan317 點擊:
             本文將探討理性決策過程這一主題。它將解釋并定義管理者在組織中實施新項目時將面臨的三種決策偏差,進而提出可以實施的策略來克服這些破壞性問題。討論將以實例加以支持,以幫助以清晰和準確的方式理解這一概念。本文應用Robbins等人提出的“理性決策模型”的定義。“理性決策描述了在特定約束條件下一致且價值最大化的選擇。”     
      This essay will discuss the topic of the rational decision making process. It will explain and define three decision biases that a manager will face when implementing a new project in an organisation, proceeding to put forward strategies which can be implemented to overcome these undermining issues. The discussion will be supported with examples to aid in the understanding of the concept in a clear and precise manner. This essay applies the definition of the ‘Rational Decision-Making Model’ used by Robbins et al. (2011, p.65) that delineates the rational model of decision making. ‘Rational decision making describes choices that are consistent and value-maximising within specified constraints.’


      圖:the rational decision making process
       
             理性決策模型的理論解釋了“好”決策者做出深思熟慮的決策是向其他人表明決策是明智考慮的結果(Robbins等人,2011年)。理性決策模型的概念是:作為一個管理者,他將是一個完全客觀的理性的決策者,他所面臨的問題是明確和明確的,決策者的目標是明確和具體的,并且他知道所有可能的選擇和后果。還必須假定,在做出管理決策的同時,將組織的最大利益放在首位;所有這些因素都集中在一起,代表了一個理想的情景(Robbins等人,2011年)。
      Theory of the rational decision making model explains about ‘good’ decision-makers that make well thought out decisions are showing to others that the decisions are the outcome of intelligent deliberation (Robbins et al, 2011). The concept of the rational decision making model assumes that as a manager one will be a fully objective and a rational decision maker, the problem one is faced with is clear and unambiguous, the decision maker’s goal is clear and specific and that one knows all the possible alternatives and consequences. It also must be assumed that managerial decisions are made while keeping the best interests of the organisation a high priority; all aspects in which come together to represent an ideal scenario (Robbins et al, 2011).
       
             在一個項目的早期階段,失敗的根源就被種下了。正是這種生動性使管理者對項目有信心并相信它會成功。為了使項目看起來對其他人有吸引力,削減了估算成本和時間表,提高了利潤估算,直到項目在紙上看起來不錯為止(Hodgeson&Drummond 2009)。這往往使企業背負著沉重的債務,因為它們沒有足夠的儲備來資助這一搖搖欲墜的項目。生動性指的是人類傾向于更多地關注豐富多彩的圖像(新的令人興奮的項目),而不是硬的事實。一個人可能會被一股經濟上不太理想的熱情所吸引,因為它的所有外在吸引力和光芒(Schmidt&Cantanlone 2002)更準確地說,管理者需要簡化問題,以便使問題變得有意義。這會導致決策偏差,因為人們會對看似重要的方面付出更多的細節,而忽略了其他潛在的重要信息(Hodgson&Drummond,2009)。
      It is early on in the course of a project that the origins of failure are planted. It is vividness that leads a manager to have confidence in the project and believe that it will succeed. In order to make the project look appealing to others, estimated costs and timelines get cut down and profit estimates get scaled up until the project looks good on paper (Hodgson & Drummond 2009). This often leaves businesses burdened with debt as they have not got sufficient reserves to fund the flailing project. Vividness refers to the way in which humans have a tendency to pay more attention to colourful imagery (new exciting projects) than the hard facts. One can become swept along on a wave of enthusiasm that can be economically sub-optimal, for all its exterior appeal and shine (Schmidt & Cantanlone 2002) to be more precise, managers need to simplify problems in order to make sense of them. This leads to decision bias, as one will pay greater detail to the aspects which seemingly look to be of importance; whilst ignoring other potentially significant information (Hodgson & Drummond, 2009).


      圖:Balancing risk and opportunity

      According to Bazerman and Moore in their article ‘Emanating from the Confirmation Heuristics’ (2009) ‘Overconfidence is related to conformation heuristics’ (p.37). Overconfidence bias is when a manager believes that they will succeed with a project, because it has been successful in the past. It is also associated with limitations and or biases in information processing (Allen & Evans 2005) Success tends to nurture over-confidence, as it confirms ones capability, as the human mind finds it easier to obtain supportive rather than contradictory evidence (Bazerman & Moore 2009). When one feels competent, it leads them to taking bigger risks as they believe that they are unable to fail. Successful organisations also tend to take bigger risks, according to Allen and Evans (2005) researchers have found that there is propensity for greater overconfidence when decision makers are performing difficult tasks, which is dangerous as research suggest that when doing a risk assessment the ability for one to be fully rational depends on the appetite for risk (Sitkin & Weingart 1995) More specifically, when a manager has a higher propensity for risk taking less risk is perceived than those who have a lower tendency for risk taking.  Implying that a manger (with a high propensity for risk taking) will tend to put more emphasis on the positive outcomes of a project rather than the negative aspects. Resulting in a tendency to over-estimate the chance of a gain, relative to the chance of a loss, leaving a distorted perception involving lower risk than is ordinarily suitable (Sitkin & Pablo 1992). Three other factors that trigger overconfidence are: illusion of control, a high commitment for a good outcome, and abstract reference points that make it difficult to compare performance across individual aspects (Malmendier & Tat, 2005).
       
      Once the project is underway, it is feedback that is crucial.  Yet feedback is likely to be misleading as information may be limited and variable leading one to the bias Escalation of Commitment. In this circumstance the manager feels one has no choice but to re-invest in the project as there is still a realistic possibility that opportunities will be met.  However as time goes on it may become evident through further feedback that the expectations will not be met (Schmidt & Calantone 2002). It is then that the decision maker violates the rational decision making model and rather than search for new alternatives, simply increases one’s commitment to the original decisions leading the project past an economically defendable point (Hodgson & Drummond 2009). It is the sunk costs that many managers forgo, as economics teaches that; sunk costs should not influence one’s future spending in a project as it is an expenditure that cannot influence the outcomes, nor can you get it back.
       
      However decision makers may not see it that way, an emotional attachment can form with the investment and the decision maker does not want to admit that their decisions were flawed. There may also be social pressure which is forcing them to finish the project and not completing the task may be seen as a failure and or a waste. Yet waste is not necessarily a bad thing, a reluctance to gain waste results in sub-optimal decisions being made. It is then that the decision maker becomes trapped because the time it has taken to pursue this project is an investment itself and giving up is no longer a viable option (Hodgson & Drummond 2009).
       
      Janney and Dess (2004) suggest to minimise the effects of vividness one should create categories of potential benefits for the project and continue on to listing all potential benefits in each of the categories. When a benefit is found that does not fit into one of the categories, it must be put aside in a separate category to be deliberated at another point in time in the near future.  Intentionally brainstorming to identify previously unconsidered potential benefits that can be gained will increase one’s insight into additional profits and enables managers to think creatively about how to solve specific problems that could arise. Hodgson and Drummond (2009) suggest that constant reality testing should be implemented. This incurs looking at different forms of data and listening to people outside one’s usual persons of reference- in particularly junior staff, as they are more likely to give an honest opinion and a truthful answer about whether a project is destined to fail or succeed rather than their superiors. Hodgson and Drummond (2009) continue on to establish that decision makers whom have been evaluated upon their process rather than the outcome will have less of a tendency to escalate figures to make it more appealing, resulting in a more rational decision.


      推薦內容
    4. 英國作業
    5. 美國作業
    6. 加拿大作業
    7. 英國essay
    8. 澳洲essay
    9. 美國essay
    10. 加拿大essay
    11. MBA Essay
    12. Essay格式范文
    13. 澳洲代寫assignment
    14. 代寫英國assignment
    15. Assignment格式
    16. 如何寫assignment
    17. case study
    18. literature review
    19. Research Proposal
    20. Summary范文
    21. Reference格式
    22. presentation
    23. report格式
    24. PEST分析法
    25. Admission Essay
    26. Personal Statement
    27. Motivation Letter
    28. Application Letter
    29. recommendation letter
    30. 联谊对象是肉食系警官12生肉